• Call Today:
  • (304) 346-2889
405 Capitol Street, Suite 807•Charleston, WV 25301
Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
    • Anthony J. Majestro
    • James C. Powell
    • Christina L. Smith
    • Graham B. Platz
    • Thomas J. Hurney IV
  • Practice Areas
    • Mass Tort Litigation
      • Mass Tort: Opioid Litigation
    • Class Action
      • Nitric Acid Leak at Ames Goldsmith Catalyst Refiners
      • The Greenbrier Clinic Mammography Lawsuit
      • Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuit
    • Product Liability
    • Government Entity Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Motor Vehicle Accidents
      • Truck Accidents
    • Appellate Law
    • Consumer Protection
      • Higher Education Fraud
      • Credit Card Debt
      • Mortgage
      • Utilities
      • West Virginia Lemon Law Attorneys
      • Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices
  • In The News
  • Blog
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: AFFF firefighting foam MDL

AFFF Firefighter Cancer Lawsuits: A Guide for West Virginia Fire Departments

June 22, 2026/by Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C.

The wail of a siren piercing the night is a sound every resident in the Kanawha Valley knows well. When industrial fires ignite or chemical spills occur on our interstates, local first responders do not hesitate to act. For decades, the standard protocol for extinguishing high-hazard, class B fuel fires involved deploying a specific type of chemical foam. It suppressed flames quickly and saved lives. Unfortunately, that same life-saving tool concealed a silent, deadly hazard.

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) contains high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known globally as “forever chemicals.” While firefighters performed their duties with bravery, manufacturers of these fluorinated foams kept the toxic reality hidden. Today, we know that routine occupational exposure to these substances has caused devastating illnesses across the nation.

What Is AFFF, and Why Is It Dangerous To Firefighters?

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) is a highly effective fire suppressant used to combat Class B liquid fires. It contains high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known as “forever chemicals.” These toxic compounds do not break down in the environment or the human body, leading to severe cellular damage and elevated cancer risks over time.

Firefighters use AFFF to smother massive, fuel-driven blazes. When mixed with water, the concentrate forms a heavy blanket that cuts off oxygen to the fire while cooling the volatile liquids underneath. While the mechanics of the foam are simple, the chemical makeup is incredibly dangerous.

PFAS foam relies on synthetic bonds between carbon and fluorine atoms, which are among the strongest bonds in chemistry. Because these compounds resist heat, water, and oil so effectively, they also resist natural degradation. Once these forever chemicals enter the human bloodstream, the body has no natural mechanism to expel them.

Over months and years, repeated exposure causes the chemicals to accumulate in the liver, kidneys, and blood. This bioaccumulation disrupts normal cellular function. Medical research shows that when PFAS chemicals contaminate the body, they trigger cellular mutation. As the toxic load increases, so does the likelihood of malignant tumor growth. The danger of fluorinated foam lies not just in its immediate toxicity, but in its persistence. A first responder who washed down equipment in the 1990s may still carry elevated levels of those same chemicals in their bloodstream today, silently increasing their risk of severe illness decades after the initial contact.

Which Cancers Are Directly Linked To AFFF Exposure?

Medical research and ongoing multidistrict litigation heavily link AFFF exposure to several specific cancers. The most established connections include kidney cancer, testicular cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Firefighters who regularly use or train with fluorinated foam face a significantly higher risk of developing these life-threatening conditions.

The medical community has established a clear connection between occupational exposure to forever chemicals and specific oncological diagnoses. Firefighters have a 9 percent higher risk of developing cancer and a 14 percent higher risk of dying from the disease compared to the general public. As research expands, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health identifies heightened occupational cancer risks for firefighters handling these exact chemical compounds.

The current toxic occupational exposure litigation primarily focuses on diseases with the strongest scientific correlation to PFAS. Qualifying injuries typically include:

  • Kidney Cancer: The kidneys filter toxins from the blood, making them a primary target for accumulated PFAS damage.
  • Testicular Cancer: Significant biomonitoring studies have linked high levels of fluorinated foam exposure to testicular malignancies.
  • Prostate Cancer: Prolonged chemical accumulation elevates the risk of aggressive prostate tumors.
  • Bladder Cancer: As the body attempts to process the forever chemicals, the bladder lining absorbs heavy toxic loads.
  • Pancreatic Cancer: Chemical disruption of the endocrine and digestive systems correlates with pancreatic tumors.
  • Thyroid Cancer and Disease: PFAS chemicals mimic and disrupt normal hormone production, leading to severe thyroid conditions.

When a first responder receives a devastating diagnosis, documenting the precise medical timeline becomes vital. Getting comprehensive treatment and clear pathology reports from respected local institutions like CAMC in Charleston or WVU Medicine in Morgantown forms the foundation of any future legal claim. Attorneys file injury claims based on these precise, documented diagnoses, relying on the standard of care established by treating oncologists.

How Did PFAS Chemicals Expose West Virginia First Responders?

West Virginia first responders encountered PFAS primarily through routine equipment checks, direct suppression of chemical or fuel fires, and training exercises. Because AFFF was standard issue for decades at municipal fire stations, military bases, and airports across the state, thousands of firefighters absorbed these chemicals through skin contact, inhalation, and contaminated gear.

Many people assume exposure only occurred during massive industrial emergencies. However, the reality of firehouse life involved constant, low-level interaction with these chemicals. Manufacturers designed class B foam to be mixed, tested, and cleaned up routinely.

Common exposure pathways for local personnel include:

  • Routine Washdowns: After a call, personnel washed the sticky foam off their trucks, hoses, and boots, often absorbing the chemicals through dermal (skin) contact.
  • Equipment Testing: Monthly or weekly equipment calibrations required, spraying foam into designated pits or drains, resulting in aerosolized PFAS inhalation.
  • Turnout Gear Contamination: Forever chemicals saturated heavy bunker gear. The heat of subsequent fires would cause the trapped chemicals to off-gas, exposing the wearer repeatedly.
  • Training Exercises: For decades, recruits practiced on live fuel fires at training academies, dousing the flames with highly concentrated PFAS foam.

Beyond municipal departments, West Virginia hosts numerous high-risk facilities. Personnel stationed at Yeager Airport or serving at regional Air National Guard bases faced mandatory AFFF usage requirements per federal aviation and military guidelines. In these environments, firefighters handled massive quantities of the foam, leading to severe, concentrated exposure.

Who Is Liable For Firefighter Foam Injuries?

The current AFFF litigation targets the chemical manufacturers who designed and sold the foam, not local fire departments or municipalities. Companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours face strict liability claims because internal documents reveal they knew about the severe health hazards of PFAS for decades but failed to warn the public or emergency responders.

When discussing legal action, many firefighters express hesitation because they do not want to sue the cities or departments they dedicated their lives to serving. It is vital to understand that an AFFF lawsuit does not target your local fire chief, your municipality, or the state of West Virginia.

Attorneys file injury claims directly against the multinational corporations that produced the toxic products. Manufacturers conceal health risks when massive profits are on the line. Legal discovery in these cases has revealed a corporate strategy remarkably similar to the one used by the tobacco industry in the 1990s. Internal memos from companies like 3M and DuPont indicate they possessed scientific data showing that PFAS chemicals contaminate groundwater and cause cellular damage long before the public was aware.

Instead of issuing warnings, pulling the products, or developing safer alternatives, they continued to market class B foam as the ultimate safety tool. By actively withholding this information, these companies breached their legal duty to consumers. Under product liability law, manufacturers face strict liability for releasing a defectively designed product into the stream of commerce while failing to warn users of its inherent dangers.

What Is The Statute Of Limitations For AFFF Claims In West Virginia?

Under West Virginia law, the statute of limitations for personal injury and product liability claims is two years. However, because toxic exposure illnesses take years to develop, West Virginia applies the discovery rule. This means the two-year filing window begins when a firefighter knew, or reasonably should have known, that AFFF exposure caused their cancer diagnosis.

Every legal claim is governed by strict deadlines. Missing a filing deadline permanently bars you from seeking compensation, regardless of how strong your evidence might be. For individuals living and working in this state, the rules are defined clearly by W. Va. Code § 55-2-12, which establishes a two-year window for bringing a personal injury lawsuit.

However, toxic occupational exposure cases present a unique legal challenge. A firefighter might have used AFFF daily from 1995 to 2010 but not develop kidney cancer until 2024. If the two-year clock started ticking on the date of their last exposure, their right to sue would have expired long before they even got sick.

To prevent this injustice, courts apply the “discovery rule.” Under this legal doctrine, the statute of limitations is tolled or paused until the injury is discovered. The two-year countdown begins on the date the claimant receives their cancer diagnosis and makes the connection that their illness was likely caused by their occupational exposure.

Even with the protection of the discovery rule, acting promptly is necessary. Evidence fades, witnesses relocate, and the national litigation continues to move forward rapidly.

How Does The AFFF Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2873) Work?

AFFF cancer claims are consolidated into Multidistrict Litigation 2873 in federal court. This process groups thousands of similar cases together for pretrial discovery to increase efficiency, while keeping each plaintiff’s specific medical claim distinct. Unlike a class action, an MDL evaluates compensation based on the individual firefighter’s specific diagnosis and exposure history.

Because thousands of first responders, military personnel, and airport workers across the country have suffered similar injuries from the same chemical manufacturers, the federal court system has centralized these cases. They are currently managed under Multidistrict Litigation 2873 (MDL 2873).

Many people confuse an MDL with a class action settlement, but they operate very differently.

  • Class Action: In a class action, one or two lead plaintiffs represent an entire group. If the case settles or goes to trial, every member of the class receives a uniform payout, regardless of how severe their individual injuries might be.
  • Multidistrict Litigation: In an MDL, cases are combined purely for pretrial efficiency. The judge oversees the gathering of evidence, expert depositions, and document requests from the chemical manufacturers all at once. However, your lawsuit remains entirely your own.

When it comes time to determine financial compensation, your case is evaluated based on its own merits. The severity of your cancer, the length of your exposure, and the impact on your life dictate the potential settlement value. Furthermore, engaging in the federal MDL does not mean you have to hire an out-of-state lawyer. A family from Wheeling or Beckley keeps their local West Virginia legal team to manage their individual claim while participating in the broader national process.

What Evidence Do You Need To File An AFFF Cancer Lawsuit?

Filing a successful AFFF lawsuit requires two main types of evidence: proof of exposure and medical documentation. You must provide employment records demonstrating you worked in environments where class B foam was used, alongside formal medical records from a licensed oncologist diagnosing a PFAS-related cancer.

Building a strong product liability case requires detailed documentation. The chemical companies have massive legal defense teams whose sole job is to argue that something else caused your illness. To combat these defenses, we must build an airtight timeline connecting your work history to your diagnosis.

To pursue a claim within MDL 2873, you will generally need to gather the following evidence:

  • Employment and Service Records: Official documentation showing your tenure at a municipal department, airport, or military installation.
  • Station Logs and Incident Reports: Records detailing the types of fires fought, the equipment used, and the frequency of AFFF deployment.
  • Training Certificates: Documentation proving attendance at fire academies or specialized hazardous materials training where fluorinated foam was utilized.
  • Comprehensive Medical Records: Formal diagnostic paperwork from treating facilities like Cabell Huntington Hospital or regional cancer centers.
  • Pathology Reports: Detailed laboratory results identifying the specific type and stage of the cancer.
  • Pharmacy and Treatment Logs: A record of all chemotherapy, radiation treatments, surgeries, and prescribed medications required to treat the illness.

What Compensation Can Firefighters Recover For PFAS Exposure?

Firefighters harmed by AFFF can recover compensation for both economic and non-economic damages. This includes coverage for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, and financial recovery for the pain, suffering, and emotional distress caused by a severe cancer diagnosis and rigorous medical treatments.

A severe cancer diagnosis devastates a family’s financial stability. The physical toll is compounded by mounting hospital bills, expensive prescription medications, and the sudden inability to work. Holding chemical manufacturers accountable means pursuing full financial compensation for every way the exposure has damaged your life.

Victims in toxic tort cases typically seek two main categories of damages:

  • Economic Damages: These are the tangible, measurable financial losses incurred due to the illness. They include all past medical bills related to the diagnosis, as well as the projected costs of future care, such as continuous oncology monitoring, surgeries, and specialized treatments. Additionally, economic damages cover lost wages for the time you were unable to work, and diminished future earning capacity if the illness forces early retirement.
  • Non-Economic Damages: These address the profound human cost of the disease. Non-economic damages provide financial recovery for physical pain, debilitating discomfort from treatments, mental anguish, and the loss of enjoyment of life. Watching a career you loved be cut short by corporate negligence causes severe emotional distress, and the legal system assigns financial value to that suffering.

Every case is different, and no attorney can guarantee a specific settlement amount or verdict. The compensation obtained depends heavily on the specific facts of your medical history, your age at diagnosis, and the documented extent of your chemical exposure.

Protecting West Virginia Firefighters And Their Families

The landscape of toxic exposure litigation is shifting as more evidence of corporate negligence comes to light. Our attorneys at Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C. are dedicated to holding these massive corporations accountable. We handle complex mass tort litigation while providing the personalized, compassionate attention your family deserves during a difficult health crisis. We know the local landscape, we understand the federal MDL process, and we are prepared to build a strong case on your behalf. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay no attorney’s fees unless we recover compensation for you.

If you or a loved one served as a firefighter and later developed cancer, explore your legal options while the momentum is strong and evidence is available. Call us today to schedule your free, confidential consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is An AFFF Lawsuit A Lawsuit Against My Fire Department?

No, filing a claim does not mean you are suing your local municipality, the state, or your fire chief. These product liability lawsuits strictly target the chemical manufacturers, such as 3M and DuPont, who designed the toxic foam and failed to warn users about the severe health risks.

Do I Have A Case If I Am A Volunteer Firefighter?

Yes, volunteer personnel have the exact same legal rights as career professionals. The multidistrict litigation focuses entirely on the extent of your chemical exposure and your medical diagnosis, not your payroll status or job title.

Can My Family File A Wrongful Death Claim If My Spouse Died From AFFF-Related Cancer?

Yes, surviving spouses and eligible family members can pursue a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of a deceased first responder. These claims seek compensation for the loss of financial support, funeral expenses, and the profound loss of companionship caused by the manufacturer’s negligence.

How Much Does It Cost To Hire An Attorney For An AFFF Claim?

You pay nothing out of pocket to begin your legal case. Our firm handles these complex mass tort claims on a strict contingency fee basis, meaning we only collect legal fees if we successfully secure a financial settlement or court verdict on your behalf.

Are Airport And Military Firefighters Eligible To File Claims?

Absolutely. Personnel stationed at commercial airports, Air National Guard bases, and federal military installations faced some of the highest exposure rates due to strict federal regulations that mandated the frequent use of AFFF for training and emergency response.

https://www.powellmajestro.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AFFF-Firefighter-Cancer-Lawsuits_-A-Guide-for-West-Virginia-Fire-Departments.png 625 1200 Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C. https://powellmajestro.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/logo.png Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C.2026-06-22 06:34:102026-06-22 06:34:28AFFF Firefighter Cancer Lawsuits: A Guide for West Virginia Fire Departments

PFAS Contamination Litigation: What to Know About the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL and Ongoing Settlements

March 30, 2026/by Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C.

For decades, West Virginia has been ground zero for the “forever chemical” crisis. While the world learned about C8 and PFAS through movies like Dark Waters and the visible scarring of the Ohio River Valley, our communities have lived it. From the industrial corridors of the Kanawha Valley to the runways of Yeager Airport and the quiet neighborhoods surrounding the Shepherd Field Air National Guard Base in Martinsburg, the legacy of chemical exposure is written into our land and our medical histories.

In early 2026, this battle has shifted to a new and critical front: the AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) litigation. While major settlements have been reached for water providers, the fight for individual victims, firefighters, military personnel, and residents with cancer is entering a decisive phase in the federal Multidistrict Litigation (MDL).

The Hidden Danger in the Foam: Understanding AFFF

Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) was the gold standard for fighting high-hazard fuel fires for over fifty years. Used extensively by the military, airports, and municipal fire departments from Charleston to Morgantown, this foam contained high concentrations of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).

These chemicals earned the nickname “forever chemicals” because they do not break down in nature. Instead, they bioaccumulate in the human body. When AFFF was sprayed during training exercises or emergency responses, it didn’t just vanish. It seeped into the groundwater, flowed into the Kanawha and Ohio Rivers, and coated the gear of the brave men and women who used it.

Today, science links this exposure to severe health outcomes, including:

  • Kidney Cancer
  • Testicular Cancer
  • Thyroid Disease and Cancer
  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Liver Cancer

West Virginia’s Unique Exposure Landscape

While AFFF exposure is a national issue, the impact in West Virginia is particularly concentrated due to our industrial and military history. The litigation is not limited to one specific site; it encompasses a broad map of contamination that affects both rural and urban communities.

High-Risk Areas in West Virginia Include:

  • Shepherd Field Air National Guard Base (Martinsburg): Historical use of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) during training exercises and emergency responses has led to significant groundwater concerns. This contamination directly impacts local residential wells and poses a threat to the Big Spring water supply, a major source for the region. The extent of PFAS migration is a primary focus of environmental regulators and ongoing litigation.
  • Yeager Airport (Charleston): Decades of required FAA testing and calibration of fire suppression systems, which heavily involved the discharge of AFFF, have contributed to pervasive soil and water contamination concerns in the surrounding Kanawha Valley. The airport’s location near waterways increases the risk of off-site migration of these persistent chemicals.
  • Industrial Sites along the Ohio River: The “Chemical Valley” region has a dual history relevant to PFAS litigation. It has been a site for the manufacturing and processing of PFAS chemicals, and also a heavy user of AFFF for industrial fire safety protocols within chemical plants, refineries, and bulk storage facilities. This combination has created particularly complex contamination profiles.
  • Local Fire Stations: Volunteer and municipal fire departments across key West Virginia counties, including Kanawha, Cabell, and Berkeley, frequently stored and used AFFF for both training and active fire suppression. Crucially, personnel were not warned of the severe cancer and health risks associated with PFAS exposure, leading to numerous occupational exposure claims.

Who Is Eligible to File an AFFF Lawsuit in West Virginia?

Anyone diagnosed with a qualifying cancer (kidney, testicular, liver, thyroid) or ulcerative colitis after significant exposure to firefighting foam, either through occupational use as a firefighter/military personnel or through contaminated drinking water, may be eligible.

Determining eligibility in 2026 involves looking at two distinct categories of plaintiffs: those who handled the product and those who lived near it. The federal courts are currently prioritizing cases where there is a clear link between the duration of exposure and the specific medical diagnosis.

  • Occupational Exposure: This includes civilian firefighters, U.S. military service members, and airport workers who physically handled, sprayed, or wore gear soaked in AFFF. The “presumptive” exposure levels for these individuals are generally higher.
  • Environmental Exposure: Residents living near airbases like Shepherd Field or industrial sites where AFFF was heavily used. Eligibility here often requires proving that your local water source tested positive for high levels of PFOA or PFOS.
  • Qualifying Diagnoses: The strongest claims currently in the MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) involve kidney cancer, testicular cancer, hypothyroidism/thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis. Other cancers are being evaluated, but may require more specific evidence.

What Is the Average Settlement for a PFAS Contamination Claim?

While no guaranteed “average” exists, legal analysts anticipate individual settlement tiers in 2026 to range between $75,000 and $500,000+, depending heavily on the severity of the illness, the age of the victim, and the strength of the exposure evidence.

It is critical to distinguish these personal injury settlements from the billion-dollar “water provider” settlements you may have seen in the news. The settlements involving 3M ($10.3 billion) and DuPont ($1.18 billion) were primarily for municipalities to clean up water systems. The current phase of litigation is focused on compensating individual people for their suffering.

  • Tiering Systems: Settlements are likely to be distributed using a points-based tier system. A young firefighter with kidney cancer and no family history of the disease will likely be in a higher “tier” (receiving a larger settlement) than an older individual with multiple co-morbidities.
  • Bellwether Trials: The values are being driven by “bellwether” (test) trials. Recent and upcoming trials in the MDL are testing the strength of kidney and testicular cancer claims specifically. If juries return large verdicts in these test cases, settlement offers from defendants generally increase.
  • Deductions: Final settlement amounts are net figures, meaning attorney fees and litigation costs are deducted. However, compensation is intended to cover past medical bills, future monitoring, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

How Do I Prove My Illness Was Caused by Firefighting Foam Exposure?

Proof requires a combination of medical records showing a qualifying diagnosis and service/employment records or water district reports that document your presence in a contaminated area or role during the relevant timeframes.

You do not need to have a sample of the foam you used twenty years ago. The courts understand that evidence from decades past can be difficult to obtain, so the legal standard relies on reconstructing your history through available documentation.

  • Service and Employment Records: For veterans and firefighters, DD214 forms, station logs, and training certificates are vital. They prove you were at a specific base (e.g., Martinsburg Air National Guard Base) or fire station during years when AFFF was the standard.
  • Medical History: You need pathology reports confirming your cancer or disease diagnosis. It is also helpful to have medical records that rule out other common causes (like a genetic predisposition), which strengthens the argument that chemical exposure was the primary cause.
  • Water District Notices: If you are claiming environmental exposure, save any “Do Not Drink” notices or water quality reports sent by your local PSD (Public Service District). These public records serve as proof of the contamination source.

The Statute of Limitations: The Clock Is Ticking in West Virginia

In West Virginia, the general statute of limitations for personal injury is two years. However, toxic tort cases like these rely heavily on the “Discovery Rule.”

This rule means the two-year clock does not necessarily start on the day you were exposed (which could have been 1995), but rather on the date you knew or should have known that your illness was linked to PFAS exposure.

For example, if you were diagnosed with kidney cancer in 2020 but only learned about the AFFF link in 2025 due to a news report or legal notice, you may still be eligible to file. However, once you have that knowledge, the clock starts immediately. Waiting too long can permanently bar you from recovery, regardless of how severe your illness is.

Medical Monitoring: A West Virginia Advantage

West Virginia is one of the few states that recognizes a claim for medical monitoring. This means that even if you have been significantly exposed to AFFF but have not yet developed cancer, you may be able to sue to have the chemical companies pay for your regular medical screenings.

Given the high cost of specialized cancer screenings and blood tests for PFAS levels, this is a crucial legal avenue for residents in high-exposure zones like those near the Ohio River or air national guard bases.

Contact Powell & Majestro for a Free Consultation

If you are a firefighter, veteran, or resident of West Virginia facing a cancer diagnosis you believe is linked to AFFF or PFAS exposure, you need legal counsel who understands both the federal MDL landscape and the local courts in Charleston and beyond. The defendants in these cases include some of the largest chemical manufacturers in the world. They have teams of lawyers fighting to minimize their payouts. You deserve a team that will fight just as hard for you.

Call Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C. today at (304) 346-2889 or contact us online to schedule your free consultation. We can help you gather your records, evaluate your eligibility, and ensure your claim is filed before the statute of limitations expires.

https://www.powellmajestro.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/PFAS-Contamination-Litigation_-What-to-Know-About-the-AFFF-Firefighting-Foam-MDL-and-Ongoing-Settlements.png 768 1408 Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C. https://powellmajestro.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/logo.png Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C.2026-03-30 07:56:072026-03-30 07:56:59PFAS Contamination Litigation: What to Know About the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL and Ongoing Settlements

Our Latest Posts

  • Why Did the FDA Stop Mammograms at The Greenbrier Clinic?
  • How Long Does a Hospital Have to Tell You About a Data Breach?
  • Does West Virginia’s Medical Malpractice Law Apply If You Weren’t Physically Injured?
  • Does a Software Update Count as a Repair Attempt Under West Virginia’s Lemon Law?
  • What Is West Virginia’s Modified Comparative Fault Rule? 50% Bar Explained
  • Negative Option Billing: The Auto-Renewal Trap Costing Billions
  • AFFF Firefighter Cancer Lawsuits: A Guide for West Virginia Fire Departments
  • Historic Jury Verdicts Against Meta: What the $375 Million New Mexico Win Means for West Virginia Families
  • The Insurance Adjuster’s Playbook: Tactics Used Against West Virginia Vehicle Accident Victims
  • DNA Testing Scams: Is Your Genetic Data for Sale?

Since 2002, Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C. has helped West Virginia residents overcome legal problems and secure the justice they deserve. Our firm is well-known as a premier resource for clients who want experienced, dynamic legal representation.

Contact Us

Charleston
405 Capitol Street
Suite 807
Charleston, WV 25301

Phone: 304-346-2889
Toll Free: (800) 650-2889

Maps & Directions

Email

Navigate

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
  • Co-Counsel – Attorney Referrals
  • In The News
  • Blog
  • Contact

Follow Us

More Donors, More Hope

Every registered organ donor offers hope to people who need transplants – and to the families who love them.

The information on this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us via phone or electronic mail to discuss your potential case. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

© 2026 Powell & Majestro P.L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. This is a Too Darn Loud - Digital Marketing law firm website.
  • Terms
  • Sitemap
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

Urgent Notice: The Greenbrier Clinic Mammography Patients

Did you receive a mammogram at The Greenbrier Clinic between October 28, 2023, and February 26, 2026?

The FDA recently ordered The Greenbrier Clinic to stop performing mammograms after determining the facility failed to meet clinical image quality standards required by federal law. Hundreds of patients have been notified that their results may be unreliable or inaccurate.

You May Be Entitled to Compensation

If you received a notification letter dated March 23, 2026, or underwent screening during the dates above, you may have a legal claim. Powell & Majestro, PLLC is currently accepting clients for a class action lawsuit to hold the clinic accountable.

LEARN MORE